Clause 14 - Certification

14.1 Promotional material must not be issued unless its final form, to which no subsequent amendments will be made, has been certified by one person on behalf of the company in the manner provided for by this clause. This person must be a registered medical practitioner or a pharmacist registered in the UK or alternatively, in the case of a product for dental use only, a UK registered dentist.

The person certifying on behalf of the company must not be the person responsible for developing or drawing up the material.

 

 

  • Clause 14.1 Certification

    Clause 14.1 Certification

    An acceptable way to comply with Clause 14.1 is for the final proof to be certified but this is not obligatory provided that that which is certified is in its final form to which no subsequent
    amendments will be made. Companies may use validated electronic signatures for certifying material. Paper or electronic copies of certificates and the final form of material etc must be
    preserved in order to comply with Clause 14.6.

    When certifying material where the final form is to be printed companies can certify the final electronic version of the item to which no subsequent amendments will be made. When such material is printed the company must ensure that the printed material cannot be used until any one of the company’s signatories has checked and signed the item in its final form. In
    such circumstances the material will have two certificates and both must be preserved.

    All promotional material must be certified in this way including audio and audio-visual material, promotional material on databases, interactive data systems and the Internet and relevant representatives’ briefing materials. Promotional aids must also be certified. Although not strictly promotional material they are used for a promotional purpose.

    Account should be taken of the fact that a non-promotional item can be used for a promotional purpose and therefore come within the scope of the Code.

    In certifying audio and audio-visual material and promotional material on databases, interactive systems and the Internet, companies must ensure that a written transcript of the material is certified including reproductions of any graphs, tables and the like that appear in it. In the event of a complaint, a copy of the written material will be requested. Alternatively, companies may certify material on interactive systems by means of producing an electronic copy, for example on a CD Rom or data stick, if the electronic copy is write protected and unable to be changed.

    The guidelines on company procedures relating to the Code which are on page 53 give further information on certification.

    See also the supplementary information to Clause 3 on promotion at international conferences regarding the certification of such material.

     

  • Clause 14.1 Certifying Digital Material

    When certifying dynamic content for websites, care must be taken to ensure the dynamic content meets the requirements of the Code both as a standalone item and within the context in which it appears. The final form of digital material might not be static.

  • Clause 14.1 Suitable Qualifications for Signatories

    In deciding whether a person can be a nominated signatory, account should be taken of product knowledge, relevant experience both within and outwith the industry, length of service and seniority. In addition signatories must have an up-to-date, detailed knowledge of the Code.

  • Clause 14.1 Joint Ventures and Co-Promotion

    In a joint venture in which a third party provides a service on behalf of a number of pharmaceutical companies, the pharmaceutical companies involved are responsible for any activity carried out by that third party on their behalf.

    It follows therefore that the pharmaceutical companies involved should be aware of all aspects of the service carried out on their behalf and take this into account when certifying the material or activity involved. Similarly if two or more pharmaceutical companies organise a joint meeting each company should ensure that the arrangements for the meeting are acceptable.

    Under co-promotion arrangements or other arrangements where companies work together, such as joint working projects, the companies concerned can agree to have only one final signatory to certify on behalf of all the companies. This must all be agreed beforehand and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority must be informed in advance who the signatory will be. In the event of a complaint about material certified in this way each company involved in the project/activity would be responsible under the Code.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3159/2/19 - Pharmacosmos v Vifor Breach: 12.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 7.2, 9.1, 12.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 13 February 2019 Completed: 13 December 2019 AUTH/3185/4/19 - Complainant v Mundibiopharma Breach: 4.1, 7.2, 7.3, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 7.8 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 April 2019 Completed: 27 November 2019 AUTH/3163/2/19 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 3.1, 14.1 No breach: 4.1, 4.9, 11.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 February 2019 Completed: 12 November 2019 AUTH/3177/3/19 - Anonymous v Grunenthal Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 7.10, 16.1, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 March 2019 Completed: 02 October 2019 AUTH/2979/9/17 - Anonymous, non-contactable complainant v PharmaMar Certification and Promotion of Yondelis Breach: 2, 3.2, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 21 September 2017 Completed: 18 September 2019 AUTH/3179/4/19 - Complainant v GlaxoSmithKline Breach: 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 02 April 2019 Completed: 16 September 2019 AUTH/3153/1/19 - Anonymous v Otsuka Europe Breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 30 January 2019 Completed: 05 July 2019 AUTH/3127/12/18 - Voluntary admission by Merck Sharp & Dohme Breach: 4.1, 14.1 No breach: 9.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 30 November 2018 Completed: 21 February 2019 AUTH/3059/8/18 - Anonymous, non-contactable, employee v Lundbeck Company webpage and certification of promotional material Breach: 14.1, 14.4, 26.1, 26.2, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 August 2018 Completed: 19 December 2018 AUTH/3038/4/18 - Health professional v Novartis Conduct of an employee on LinkedIn Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.2, 26.1 No breach: 2, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 April 2018 Completed: 05 December 2018 AUTH/3063/9/18 - Voluntary admission by Dr Falk Pharma Promotion to the public via YouTube Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 September 2018 Completed: 12 November 2018 AUTH/3028/3/18 - Ex-Employee v AbbVie Production of a poster and use of case studies Breach: 9.1, 9.10, 14.1 No breach: 2, 15.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 23 March 2018 Completed: 17 October 2018 AUTH/3017/2/18 - Anonymous contactable v Celgene Certification and approval of material for meetings Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 15.9 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 31 January 2018 Completed: 02 August 2018 AUTH/2997/12/17 - Anonymous health professional v AbbVie Promotion of Synagis Breach: 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 15.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 December 2017 Completed: 17 July 2018 AUTH/3018/2/18 - Voluntary admission from Tesaro Failure to certify material before use Breach: 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 09 February 2018 Completed: 31 May 2018 AUTH/3015/1/18 - Voluntary admission by Daiichi-Sankyo Notification of signatories Breach: 14.1, 14.4 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 January 2018 Completed: 30 May 2018 AUTH/2831/4/16 - Voluntary admission by Celgene Meetings organised by representatives Breach: 2, 4.1, 4.10, 9.1, 14.1, 15.2, 18.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 01 April 2016 Completed: 18 April 2018 AUTH/3012/1/18 - Voluntary admission by Pierre Fabre Failure to certify material Breach: 2, 3.1, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 14.1, 15.9 No breach: 4.8 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 January 2018 Completed: 21 March 2018 AUTH/2988/10/17 - Employee v Otsuka Manager’s use of LinkedIn to promote medicines Breach: 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 7.2, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 No breach: 1.2, 2, 9.10, 12.1, 22, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 31 October 2017 Completed: 25 January 2018 AUTH/2962/7/17 - Sales representative v Pierre Fabre Call rates and certification of meetings Breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1, 15.9 No breach: 9.1, 14.1, 15.4, 15.9, 16.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 31 July 2017 Completed: 05 January 2018 AUTH/2958/5/17 - Voluntary admission by Astellas Europe Use of withdrawn advertisement Breach: 2, 7.11, 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 23 May 2017 Completed: 17 July 2017 AUTH/2871/8/16 - Voluntary admission by Janssen Pre-licence promotion Breach: 2, 3.2, 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 22 August 2016 Completed: 06 October 2016 AUTH/2870/8/16 - Voluntary admission by Janssen Trevicta advertisements Breach: 4.7, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 10 August 2016 Completed: 23 August 2016 AUTH/2854/7/16 - Voluntary admission by Boehringer Ingelheim Failure to certify the final form of promotional material Breach: 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 July 2016 Completed: 08 August 2016 AUTH/2844/5/16 - Voluntary admission by Amdipharm Mercury Email sent by a representative Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 15.4 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 11 May 2016 Completed: 07 July 2016 AUTH/3176/3/19 - Complainant v Orion Breach: 9.1, 9.10 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 12.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 23 March 2019 Completed: 02 October 2019 AUTH/3168/2/19 - Complainant v Janssen Breach: 4.1, 4.6, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1 No breach: 2, 4.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 7.2, 12.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 27 June 2019 AUTH/3166/2/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Breach: 9.1, 14.5, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.9, 9.9, 11.1, 12.1, 14.1, 16.1, 28.1, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 11 June 2019 AUTH/2883/10/16 - Voluntary admission by Astellas UK Patient support programmes Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 21, 24.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 October 2016 Completed: 22 May 2019 AUTH/3067/9/18 - Member of the public v Chiesi Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 September 2018 Completed: 03 May 2019 AUTH/3029/4/18 - Complainant v GW Pharmaceuticals Arrangements for a meeting, alleged promotion of Epidiolex and unapproved slides No breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 14.1, 15.2, 22.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 05 April 2018 Completed: 21 December 2018 AUTH/3030/4/18 - Anonymous employee v UCB Activities under the Code No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1, 15.3, 15.4, 15.9 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 April 2018 Completed: 03 July 2018 AUTH/2960/6/17 - Hospital Doctor v A Menarini Certification of company website Breach: 2, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 14.6 No breach: 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 12 June 2017 Completed: 09 August 2017 AUTH/2926/1/17 - Pharmaceutical physician v Stirling Anglian Use of the word ‘new’ Breach: 7.11 No breach: 7.11, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 02 January 2017 Completed: 23 February 2017 AUTH/2857/7/16 - Anonymous, non-contactable v Daiichi-Sankyo Promotional activities and call rates Breach: 15.4, 15.9 No breach: 2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 9.1, 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 July 2016 Completed: 30 September 2016

14.2 All meetings involving travel outside the UK where a UK company funds UK delegates must be certified in advance in a manner similar to that provided for by Clause 14.1.

In addition, all meetings involving travel outside the UK that are wholly or mainly for UK delegates must also be certified in advance in a manner similar to that provided for by Clause 14.1.

  • Clause 14.2 Meetings Involving Travel Outside the UK

    UK Companies have responsibilities under the Code for meetings which they organise and when UK delegates and/or UK speakers are invited or supported to go to meetings outside the UK. Clauses 23 and 24 in relation to disclosure of transfers of value will also need to be followed.

    When certifying arrangements for meetings which involve travel outside the UK all the relevant documents and arrangements must be considered including the programme, the venue, the reasons for using that venue, the intended audience, the anticipated cost and the nature of the hospitality and the like.

    If the company’s only involvement is to support a speaker to present at the meeting and there is no pharmaceutical company involvement with the meeting at all, for example a learned society meeting, then neither certification nor examination is required.

    If a UK company’s only role for meetings which are not wholly or mainly for UK delegates is to select or invite but not fund UK speakers and/or delegates, then the arrangements for such meetings should be examined by the UK company to ensure they do not contravene the Code or relevant statutory requirements.

    There is no requirement to certify arrangements for meetings held outside the UK that are wholly organised and/or funded by any overseas legal entity of a pharmaceutical company even if UK delegates are selected and invited by the overseas company unless such meetings are wholly or mainly for UK delegates. The UK company must be informed and the arrangements for meetings which involve UK delegates travelling outside the UK where the UK company has not funded the delegates should be examined by the UK company to ensure they do not contravene the Code or the relevant statutory requirements.

  • Clause 14.2 Presentations by UK Speakers at Meetings Held Outside the UK

    When a pharmaceutical company based outside the UK arranges via a UK company for a UK speaker to present at a meeting to be held outside the UK, then that speaker’s presentation materials do not need to be certified or examined by the UK provided there are no UK delegates and the UK company has no role whatsoever in relation to the meeting or the presentation. In such circumstances the meeting arrangements, in as much as they apply to the UK speaker, will not have to be certified or examined.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

14.3 The following must be certified in advance in a manner similar to that provided for by Clause 14.1:

  • educational material for the public or patients issued by companies which relates to diseases or medicines but is not intended as promotion for those medicines
  • material relating to working with patient organisations as described in Clause 27 and its supplementary information
  • material relating to joint working between the NHS and the pharmaceutical industry as described in Clause 20 and its supplementary information
  • material relating to patient support programmes involving the provision to health professionals of items to be passed on to patients as described in Clause 18.2 and its supplementary information
  • non-promotional material for patients or health professionals relating to the provision of medical and educational goods and services, including relevant internal company instructions, as described in Clause 19.1 and paragraph 8 of its supplementary information.

  • Clause 14.3 Examination of Other Material

    Other material issued by companies which relates to medicines but which is not intended as promotional material for those medicines per se, such as corporate advertising, press releases, market research material, financial information to inform shareholders, the Stock Exchange and the like, and written responses from medical information departments or similar to unsolicited enquiries from the public etc, should be examined to ensure that it does not contravene the Code or the relevant statutory requirements.

  • Clause 14.3 Non-Interventional Studies

    The examination of non-interventional studies is dealt with in Clause 2.2 and is not covered by Clause 14.

14.4 The names of those nominated as signatories as set out in Clause 14.1, together with their qualifications, shall be notified in advance to the Advertising Standards Unit, Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and to the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority. The names and qualifications of designated alternative signatories must also be given. Changes in the names of nominees must be promptly notified.

14.5 The certificate for promotional material must certify that the signatory has examined the final form of the material to ensure that in his/her belief it is in accordance with the requirements of the relevant regulations relating to advertising and this Code, is not inconsistent with the marketing authorization and the summary of product characteristics and is a fair and truthful presentation of the facts about the medicine.

The certificate for material covered by Clause 14.3 above must certify that the signatory has looked at the final form of the material to ensure that in his/her belief it complies with the Code.

Material which is still in use must be recertified at intervals of no more than two years to ensure that it continues to conform with the relevant regulations relating to advertising and the Code.

The certificate for meetings involving travel outside the UK must certify that the signatory has examined all the proposed arrangements for the meeting and that in his/her belief the arrangements are in accordance with the relevant regulations relating to advertising and the Code.

 

 

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3166/2/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Breach: 9.1, 14.5, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.9, 9.9, 11.1, 12.1, 14.1, 16.1, 28.1, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 11 June 2019 AUTH/2883/10/16 - Voluntary admission by Astellas UK Patient support programmes Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 21, 24.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 October 2016 Completed: 22 May 2019 AUTH/2972/8/17 - Anonymous healthcare journalist v UCB UCB website Breach: 2, 7.2, 9.1, 14.5, 26.2 No breach: 14.3, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 August 2017 Completed: 19 December 2017 AUTH/2960/6/17 - Hospital Doctor v A Menarini Certification of company website Breach: 2, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 14.6 No breach: 14.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 12 June 2017 Completed: 09 August 2017 AUTH/2890/11/16 - Health professional v Novo Nordisk Company website Breach: 9.10, 14.5, 26.2 No breach: 4.1, 4.6, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 November 2016 Completed: 04 April 2017 AUTH/3112/11/18 - Complainant v Lilly Breach: 9.1 No breach: 4.6, 4.10, 12.1, 14.5 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 04 November 2018 Completed: 25 May 2019 AUTH/3162/2/19 - Complainant v AstraZeneca No breach: 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 16.1, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 February 2019 Completed: 09 May 2019 AUTH/2889/11/16 - Ex-employee v AstraZeneca Websites Breach: 4.1, 4.6, 7.2, 7.3 No breach: 2, 4.1, 7.2, 9.1, 14.5 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 November 2016 Completed: 07 April 2017

14.6 Companies shall preserve all certificates. In relation to certificates for promotional material, the material in the form certified and information indicating the persons to whom it was addressed, the method of dissemination and the date of first dissemination must also be preserved. In relation to certificates for meetings involving travel outside the UK, details of the programme, the venue, the reasons for using the venue, the audience, the anticipated and actual costs and the nature of the hospitality and the like must also be preserved.

Companies shall preserve certificates and the relevant accompanying information for not less than three years after the final use of the promotional material or the date of the meeting and produce them on request from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency or the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority.

The certificates for material covered by Clause 14.3 above shall be preserved for not less than three years after the final use of the material and companies shall produce them on request from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency or the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority.

  • Clause 14.6 Retention of Documentation

    Companies should note that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is entitled to request particulars of an advertisement, including particulars as to the content and form of the advertisement, the method of dissemination and the date of first dissemination, and such a request is not subject to any time limit. This does not apply to the certificates themselves in respect of which the three year limit in Clause 14.6 is applicable.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.