Clause 8 - Disparaging References

Clause

8.1 The medicines, products and activities of other pharmaceutical companies must not be disparaged.

  • Clause 8.1 Disparaging References

    Much pharmaceutical advertising contains comparisons with other products and, by the nature of advertising, such comparisons are usually made to show an advantage of the advertised product over its comparator. Provided that such critical references to another company’s products are accurate, balanced, fair etc, and can be substantiated, they are acceptable under the Code.

    Unjustified knocking copy in which the products or activities of a competitor are unfairly denigrated is prohibited under this clause.

    Attention is drawn to the requirements for comparisons set out in Clauses 7.2 to 7.5.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3224/7/19 - Pharmacosmos v Vifor Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 14 July 2019 Completed: 25 January 2024 AUTH/3534/7/21 - Astellas v Janssen Breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.8, 7.9, 8.1 No breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.8 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 July 2021 Completed: 01 December 2022 AUTH/3396/10/20 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 7.2, 8.1, 9.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 October 2020 Completed: 27 May 2021 AUTH/3218/6/19 - Anonymous ex-employee v Otsuka UK Breach: 7.3, 8.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 7.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 21 June 2019 Completed: 01 May 2020 AUTH/3283/11/19 and AUTH/3284/11/19 - CCG Senior Pharmacist v Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Breach: 2, 7.2, 8.1, 15.2 No breach: 7.3, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 November 2019 Completed: 09 March 2020 AUTH/3514/5/21 - Ex-employee v AstraZeneca Breach: 9.1, 23.1 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 8.1, 8.2, 9.1, 12.1, 12.2, 14.1, 16.1, 18.1, 23.1 , 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 24 May 2021 Completed: 09 August 2022 AUTH/3406/10/20 - Complainant v Chiesi No breach: 2, 7.2, 8.1, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 October 2020 Completed: 16 September 2021 AUTH/3275/10/19 - Britannia v Ever Pharma Breach: 3.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.10 No breach: 2, 4.3, 7.2, 7.4, 7.8, 8.1, 9.1, 9.9, 12.1, 14.1, 16.3, 18.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 24 October 2019 Completed: 31 August 2021 AUTH/3245/9/19 - Anonymous GP (assisted by an Ex Employee) v Novo Nordisk Breach: 7.2, 9.1 No breach: 2, 3.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.10, 8.1, 9.1, 15.2, 15.9 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 September 2019 Completed: 11 March 2020

8.2 The health professions and the clinical and scientific opinions of health professionals must not be disparaged.